- luv-main - luv.asn.au

Re: FTP Mirror
by Peter Ross 21 Oct '14

21 Oct '14

> Many years ago I used a program named "mirror" that would copy the > contents of a FTP server. I have a script which runs lftp: /usr/local/bin/lftp -c "set ftp:list-options -a; open $FTPURL; cd $RCD; mirror ${MIRROROPT} ${VERBOSEOPT} $DELETE ${FTPOPTIONS}" where ${MIRROROPT} is "" or "-R" (reverse), ${DELETE} is "" or "--delete" and, in the example I just looked at, FTPOPTIONS='--exclude-glob logs/ --exclude-glob *.LCK --exclude-glob .svn/' Regards Peter

1 0

squeeze-lts signed apt oddness
by Chris Samuel 20 Oct '14

20 Oct '14

Hi folks, Due to a lack of Copious Free Time my VM in the US is still running Debian Squeeze and is set up to use squeeze-lts thus: deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ squeeze-lts main contrib non-free But it is complaining that: The following packages will be upgraded: apache2 apache2-mpm-worker apache2-threaded-dev apache2-utils apache2.2-bin apache2.2-common apt apt-utils 8 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 4404 kB of archives. After this operation, 426 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! apt apt-utils apache2-threaded-dev apache2 apache2-mpm-worker apache2.2-common apache2.2-bin apache2-utils Install these packages without verification [y/N]? n E: Some packages could not be authenticated Now we also have some Squeeze VMs at work and they are configured almost identically: deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ squeeze-lts main contrib and they do not have this same issue. Now at both locations they resolve to the same IPv4 and IPv6 addresses but my personal VM in the US is using IPv6 and the work ones are IPv4 only, so I added the v4 address to /etc/hosts on my personal VM and it doesn't make any difference. The only thought I have left is that they are anycast addresses that are hitting different mirrors (or someone is MITM'ing me) so do any Debian gurus have any hints? cheers! Chris -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC

3 4

Re: btrfs :(
by Peter Ross 20 Oct '14

20 Oct '14

From: "Russell Coker" <russell(a)coker.com.au> > Technical analysis of the features and relative merits of different > software has some value. For a FreeBSD user it is annoying if a well-known Unix/Linux desktop environment gets "Linuxalized" via systemd etc. It is obviously harder to port it to other than Linux if you think of systemd during development in the first place. It is a learning curve from shell scripts to something different. But that is okay as long as it is worthwhile. The init scripts are grown in nearly half a century and are well-thought through. In substance, a daemon start/stop script looks the same under all kinds of Unix. A postfix start/stop scripts runs under any kind of Unix/Linux so - minimizing the work to integrate it in any kind of distribution. Complexity risks to overlook problems. I remember putting a LDAP dependency in /etc/nsswitch.conf in Linux as done under FreeBSD before, and then udev starts.. waiting for a 30 seconds timeout per device created. It found it reported and closed in the Red Hat bugs database. It is not a nsswitch problem, it is not an udev problem.. nobody wanted to "own" it. It was somewhere fallen through the cracks. Best advice: "Don't do it." The containers get less and less shared resources from the base system. E.g. networking: Whether it is Solaris Crossbow architecture or FreeBSD jails v2 or newer Linux containers, they all can have their own network stack. Does it make sense to have one journald on the "host system" and one network daemon? Isn't that better located in "normal userland" (so in containers when appropriate) and so separated by default? That are questions I had in mind when going through systemd. More in general, it is a question of effort and result. Why reinventing the wheel? E.g. FreeBSD is using the old fashioned /etc/rc and this uses "rcorder" to prioritize /etc/rc.d scripts. After that they start in order - and it is possible to do things in parallel. The main reason _not_ to do so are (IMHO) a conservative approach to satisfy different environments (e.g. diskless clients etc.) You only have to modify the /etc/rc "starter" and rcorder to have parallelisation in place. For a physical server I wait for the hardware when booting, the OS initialisation only take seconds. A jail is running more or less immediately. The gain will be in millisecond range. Yes on a desktop it takes a bit of time. But start a system on a SSD and it isn't that much anymore. With hibernation you do not boot that way at all. Mobile devices with Android are using another approach all together. Not to mention Busybox. It is a huge development .. and it isn't clear how many people will actually benefit from it significantly. [This is opinion] The history of Linux daemons close to the hardware (udev, hald, policy-kit, dbus, kdbus) as well as filesystem layout (procfs,sysfs) does not convince me. It all feels half-baked (sometimes even a bit narrow-minded, "I need this for me here now", and there are huge egos involved it seems) and I am not confident about quality and security of the code which is redone every few years and with competition between different approaches (and with this, splits in attention and effort). In general, I have the feeling Linux developers are "overcomplicating" things;-) Regards Peter

10 16

Fwd: [GIT PULL] Btrfs corruption fix
by Chris Samuel 19 Oct '14

19 Oct '14

Heads up.. If there are people playing with 3.17 and btrfs at the moment then you'll want this patch, pull request for Linus below (not yet merged into the mainline so not yet a candidate for a stable release). The actual commit has a better description of the problem. https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git/commit/?… cheers, Chris ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: [GIT PULL] Btrfs corruption fix Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014, 03:51:13 AM From: Chris Mason <clm(a)fb.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds(a)linux-foundation.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org>, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs(a)vger.kernel.org> Hi Linus, I'm testing a pull with more fixes, but wanted to get this one out so Greg can pick it up. The corruption isn't easy to hit, you have to do a readonly snapshot and have orphans in the snapshot. But my review and testing missed the bug. Filipe has added a better xfstest to cover it. Please pull: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git for-linus Chris Mason (1) commits (+33/-36): Revert "Btrfs: race free update of commit root for ro snapshots" Total: (1) commits (+33/-36) fs/btrfs/inode.c | 36 ------------------------------------ fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ----------------------------------------- -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC

2 7

Re: Linux compatible portable mp3 player
by Andrew Mather 18 Oct '14

18 Oct '14

First off, I'm replying to a digest, so sorry if this breaks threaded readers... The other option, if the friend is tech-savvy themselves...(or has a tech-savvy friend :) ) is to keep the iHardware and to load it with RockBox [0] Setting it up can be a bit beyond the normal person, as modifies boot sectors and what have you, but once set up, it's pretty bullet-proof. I have two iPods, both loaded with this and it works well. Music can be copied on and off buy putting the device into disk mode and it's treated as any USB mass storage device. Playlists are easily created/modified by putting the unit into disk mode and using your text editor of choice. Also has the advantage that it supports more media formats (eg .ogg and .flac). It's also available for other players. Worth considering. One caveat is that I have not used it for video playback and have no idea of its capabilities (or otherwise) there. [0] http://www.rockbox.org/ > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:55:48 +1100 > From: "Peter Ross" <Petros.Listig(a)fdrive.com.au> > Subject: Re: Linux compatible portable mp3 player > To: luv-main(a)luv.asn.au > Message-ID: > < > 6ec7c5187cc0f33b58789b4963bc0506.squirrel(a)mailbox.alumni.tu-berlin.de> > > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 > > From: zlinw(a)mcmedia.com.au > > Thats exactly why I asked for specfic recomendations, the person > concerned > > has very large collection of "old country/bush" music from all over the > > world. His existing player an (I think) an Apple Ipod classic has been > > giving him no end of trouble by refusing to let him copy anything off the > > player. > > He wish's to get another player and does not want to fall into the same > > trap. > > This sounds like a device for a person who loves music: > > QA350 MOD V2--SD Card WAV High Fidelity Music Player > http://www.qlshifi.com/en/wzcapi/qa350_mod_v2.htm > > I found this review here: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39q09iU01sg > > I am not an expert in audio electronics so I cannot compare this "audio > dedicated" equipment against a modern phone/tablet (e.g. the mentioned > Samsung Galaxy) > > Even a simple smartphone (e.g. the ZTE Open with Firefox OS as I am using) > has a better way of browsing through a music collection as the Sony PCM > M10 or the device mentioned above. > > I love to have it on SD cards. You can easily copy it (e.g. to a USB stick > which can be used in audio equipment with an USB port), put it in a > laptop, or burn a CD etc. > > It is also easy to copy it to "the next media" coming up in five years > time. > > In fact my whole audio collection grown over the decades could fit on a > few SD cards.. > > Of course there is Neil Young's Pono: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pono_%28digital_music_service%29 > > Regards > Peter > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > luv-main mailing list > luv-main(a)luv.asn.au > http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main > > > End of luv-main Digest, Vol 38, Issue 33 > **************************************** > -- - http://surfcoast.redbubble.com | https://picasaweb.google.com/107747436224613508618 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- "Unless someone like you, cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better...It's not !" - The Lorax -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- A committee is a cul-de-sac, down which ideas are lured and then quietly strangled. *Sir Barnett Cocks <http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Sir_Barnett_Cocks/>* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- "A mind is like a parachute. It doesnt work if it's not open." :- Frank Zappa -

3 5

Re: Linux compatible portable mp3 player
by Andrew Mather 17 Oct '14

17 Oct '14

2014-10-17 4:00 GMT+02:00 Andrew Mather <mathera(a)gmail.com>: >> The other option, if the friend is tech-savvy themselves...(or has a >> tech-savvy friend :) ) is to keep the iHardware and to load it with RockBox >>[0] > >> Setting it up can be a bit beyond the normal person, as modifies boot >> sectors and what have you, but once set up, it's pretty bullet-proof. > >>I have two iPods, both loaded with this and it works well. Music can be >> copied on and off buy putting the device into disk mode and it's treated as >> any USB mass storage device. Playlists are easily created/modified by >> putting the unit into disk mode and using your text editor of choice. > >> Also has the advantage that it supports more media formats (eg .ogg and >> .flac). > Did I also mention car mode ? :) If the device is connected to external power (eg cigarette lighter) and you turn off the ignition, it resumes from where it left off once you start the car again. Brilliant. > >You convince me! I'll do as soon as I find a bit of time. How long >does it possibly take for the operation? It doesn't take long if it goes well. If you don't include downloading the image, I'd reckon 10-20 minutes to get it built and back running, then you need to reload your music. I did have a lot of trouble with one of the iPods and gave up for a few months, but a couple of versions later, all was fine. -- Mick -- - http://surfcoast.redbubble.com | https://picasaweb.google.com/107747436224613508618 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- "Unless someone like you, cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better...It's not !" - The Lorax -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- A committee is a cul-de-sac, down which ideas are lured and then quietly strangled. *Sir Barnett Cocks <http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Sir_Barnett_Cocks/>* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- "A mind is like a parachute. It doesnt work if it's not open." :- Frank Zappa -

1 0

Re: Linux compatible portable mp3 player
by Peter Ross 17 Oct '14

17 Oct '14

From: zlinw(a)mcmedia.com.au > Thats exactly why I asked for specfic recomendations, the person concerned > has very large collection of "old country/bush" music from all over the > world. His existing player an (I think) an Apple Ipod classic has been > giving him no end of trouble by refusing to let him copy anything off the > player. > He wish's to get another player and does not want to fall into the same > trap. This sounds like a device for a person who loves music: QA350 MOD V2--SD Card WAV High Fidelity Music Player http://www.qlshifi.com/en/wzcapi/qa350_mod_v2.htm I found this review here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39q09iU01sg I am not an expert in audio electronics so I cannot compare this "audio dedicated" equipment against a modern phone/tablet (e.g. the mentioned Samsung Galaxy) Even a simple smartphone (e.g. the ZTE Open with Firefox OS as I am using) has a better way of browsing through a music collection as the Sony PCM M10 or the device mentioned above. I love to have it on SD cards. You can easily copy it (e.g. to a USB stick which can be used in audio equipment with an USB port), put it in a laptop, or burn a CD etc. It is also easy to copy it to "the next media" coming up in five years time. In fact my whole audio collection grown over the decades could fit on a few SD cards.. Of course there is Neil Young's Pono: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pono_%28digital_music_service%29 Regards Peter

2 1

Free rack-mount servers
by Toby Corkindale 17 Oct '14

17 Oct '14

Anyone here want some old rack-mount servers? The dozen or so pictured here are going to get thrown out shortly. (Well, OK, we're going to pay to have them responsibly recycled, but you know what I mean) They're all pretty old so probably not worth the electricity to run them, but maybe interesting for someone to play with, so I thought I'd offer. http://s378.photobucket.com/user/wintrmute/media/servers_zpseed1402f.jpg.ht… No hard drives included. No guarantees. No specifications. No returns. Pick-up from Fitzroy ASAP. -Toby

3 6

Linux compatible portable mp3 player
by zlinw＠mcmedia.com.au 16 Oct '14

16 Oct '14

I am looking for recommendations for a portable mp3 player that will work with Linux. Basicly I hope it appears as a USB drive so one can simply copy the music to and from the player. Note:Its for a friend, I have no knowledge and in fact little interest in such devices. I am sure though this has been discussed before on this list. A search on the net produced results that were some years out of date. Lindsay

7 7

Re: Linux compatible portable mp3 player
by zlinw＠mcmedia.com.au 16 Oct '14

16 Oct '14

On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:37:58 Toby Corkindale said, >But in all seriousness -- Be careful, as plenty of MP3 players only >support MTP or proprietary protocols. Thats exactly why I asked for specfic recomendations, the person concerned has very large collection of "old country/bush" music from all over the world. His existing player an (I think) an Apple Ipod classic has been giving him no end of trouble by refusing to let him copy anything off the player. He wish's to get another player and does not want to fall into the same trap. Lindsay

3 2