- luv-main - luv.asn.au

Fedora 16 iso
by Roger 10 Nov '11

10 Nov '11

I have forgotten the process to copy the Fedora iso to dvd. CD/DVD Creator: Write to Disc offers a choice of <Burn as File> and <Burn Contents> Which of these is the correct choice to make a bootable Fedora 16 dvd that I can install from? Thanks Roger

1 0

KDE pause
by Russell Coker 06 Nov '11

06 Nov '11

Several of my relatives use KDE as their desktop environment on Debian/Squeeze, now only one system I am responsible for is i386 and the rest are all AMD64. Apart from one system they all work fine. The problem system is an AMD64 system with a single SATA disk that has a KDE pause periodically, kmail seems to be the most common culprit for triggering it. When it happens all KDE stuff stops working for a while, often logging out (by killing the session from another VT) is the only way to solve it. There are multiple users on that system who have the same problem, so it seems to be a system issue not an issue of one user with messed up KDE configuration. smartctl doesn't report any problems and other disk dependent stuff works OK when KDE isn't responding. Also when it happens there are no D state processes. So it seems that the hard drive is not responsible. Any ideas as to what I should look at to investigate this issue? Switching to GNOME is not a viable option. But as a test I might try running kmail after logging in to a GNOME session next time I visit them. Also the system is online 24*7 and has dynamic DNS configured so I can login at any time. So tests that I can do by reading log files will be preferred to tests that require doing something with the keyboard and mouse. Thanks in advance for any advice. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/

1 0

Re: [luv-main] Handling Ubuntu updates [Was: ubuntu hang after upgrade natty to oniric]
by Andrew 06 Nov '11

06 Nov '11

On 30/10/2011 6:29 PM, Erik Christiansen wrote: >> By the way, if you have numerous Debian machines needing package >> updates, you do _not_ have them all fetch those in parallel. What you >> do is have each host's apt subsystem use a shared local Squid cache you >> establish for that purpose. That way, duplicate downloads are >> eliminated automatically. > That does sound easier than doing an "apt-get --download-only", sharing > the archive via NFS (or sneakernet), and doing a "dpkg -i", but we often > just end up doing what we remember how to do. In a default configuration, Squid's ideas about what is fresh are less than ideal. There are a variety of apt specific caching programs out there, or you can give squid some rules to limit how long it will consider files to be fresh. There's two problem areas with squid. Firstly, resources can be cached for too long, so you miss critical updates. Secondly, the various files in your cache are frequently out of sync with each other. Andrew

1 0

Luv list and DKIM
by Jason White 04 Nov '11

04 Nov '11

Oct 9 12:29:12 jdc postfix/cleanup[3374]: 50CC118074A6F: milter-reject: END-OF-MESSAGE from lists2.luv.asn.au[202.158.218.239]: 5.7.1 rejected due to DKIM ADSP evaluation; from=<luv-main-bounces(a)lists.luv.asn.au> to=<jason(a)jasonjgw.net> proto=ESMTP helo=<tainted.luv.asn.au> Oct 11 10:23:02 jdc postfix/cleanup[19312]: 23E771805C2E5: milter-reject: END-OF-MESSAGE from lists2.luv.asn.au[202.158.218.239]: 5.7.1 rejected due to DKIM ADSP evaluation; from=<luv-talk-bounces(a)lists.luv.asn.au> to=<jason(a)jasonjgw.net> proto=ESMTP helo=<tainted.luv.asn.au> Oct 11 11:23:10 jdc postfix/cleanup[20280]: 49D9118046E51: milter-reject: END-OF-MESSAGE from lists2.luv.asn.au[202.158.218.239]: 5.7.1 rejected due to DKIM ADSP evaluation; from=<luv-talk-bounces(a)lists.luv.asn.au> to=<jason(a)jasonjgw.net> proto=ESMTP helo=<tainted.luv.asn.au> Oct 12 14:20:49 jdc postfix/cleanup[9322]: 96D1B180C50B5: milter-reject: END-OF-MESSAGE from lists2.luv.asn.au[202.158.218.239]: 5.7.1 rejected due to DKIM ADSP evaluation; from=<luv-talk-bounces(a)lists.luv.asn.au> to=<jason(a)jasonjgw.net> proto=ESMTP helo=<tainted.luv.asn.au> The only other error in the logs in these instances is "rejected per sender domain policy". I'm running OpenDKIM here and I haven't touched the configuration of OpenDKIM, Postfix, Bind (or anything else). The problem appears to be gone now anyway. It resulted in temporary suspension from luv-talk.

5 11

ABC RN: Future Tense: Communication, access and equality (Dili Village Telco & Serval)
by rdbrown＠pacific.net.au 03 Nov '11

03 Nov '11

http://www.abc.net.au/rn/futuretense/stories/2011/3353120.htm We look at a number of projects aiming to improve access to communication - be it the use of telephones in East Timor or Internet access in the remote interior of Australia. ... I don't think Linux was explicitly mentioned though

2 1

Re: [luv-main] [luv-announce] LUV-Main Meeting Reminder, LUV Shepparton
by Russell Coker 02 Nov '11

02 Nov '11

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, lev(a)levlafayette.com wrote: > the event. With a good turnout, LUV now has its third chapter established > (Ballarat, Geelong, Shepparton) in addition to the Melbourne city group. It would be good to have monthly status updates on what the other chapers are doing. Also how are they going for talks? Presumably they find it more difficult to get speakers than we do. What size of audience do they get? I would consider travelling to those places to give a talk if the audience is big enough... -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/

3 2

Sound Issue With Gigabyte Motherboard
by David Zuccaro 02 Nov '11

02 Nov '11

Hi, I've noticed that I get much higher volume sound output in MS windows than in Debian. Obviously I want better volume output. I've checked the volume control and PCM isn't turned down. Is there something else I could check to increase the volume output? This is the output of lspci if that's any help. dz2@Palatinus:~$ lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ/P/PL Memory Controller Hub (rev 02) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller (rev 01) 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #1 (rev 01) 00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #2 (rev 01) 00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #3 (rev 01) 00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 (rev 01) 00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 01) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge (rev e1) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801GB/GR (ICH7 Family) LPC Interface Bridge (rev 01) 00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801GB/GR/GH (ICH7 Family) SATA IDE Controller (rev 01) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) SMBus Controller (rev 01) 01:05.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8001 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 13) dz2@Palatinus:~$ uname -a Linux Palatinus 2.6.26-2-686 #1 SMP Wed Sep 21 04:35:47 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux Thanks, David

2 2

Stumped - memory compatibility issue?
by Toby Corkindale 02 Nov '11

02 Nov '11

hey all, I have an issue with some memory that has me stumped. Due to an upgrade, I had 4x1GB sticks of RAM spare, so I figured I'd put these into another machine of mine that currently only has 1 GB total. (It's a little ITX board for media playback) However, after putting the new RAM in, the machine won't boot Ubuntu reliably, and memtest+ on the Ubuntu install disc shows up lots of memory errors. The memory was also *extremely* hot when I removed it from the machine. I tried the memory in pairs of two matched sticks at a time. Returning the memory to original machine, it runs memtest+ with no errors. Is there some kind of memory incompatibility that I'm unaware of going on here? The specs: Machine A, working combination: Motherboard: Intel P35 chipset RAM: 4x 1GB of DDR2-800 Machine B, working combination: Motherboard: Zotac nForce 630i RAM: 2x 512MB of DDR2-667 The latter motherboard says it supports DDR2-800 memory. I moved the CPU over from machine A to B, but that didn't help. I was especially bothered by the RAM getting very hot - I'm pretty sure that's not normal - although that machine is in a very small case without brilliant ventilation. But it was hot after just a few minutes of run time. I wondered if you had any thoughts? Thanks, Toby

7 7

jailtime replacement
by Russell Coker 31 Oct '11

31 Oct '11

JailTime.org now redirects to Stacklet.org which requires payment before downloading. There's no way I'm paying $10 to download 143MB of Xen image! Does anyone know of a good free source for Xen images? If not does anyone want to create one? I can provide hosting for Bittorrent... -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/

4 5

Some decent speakers for PC's
by Lindsay Sprinter 30 Oct '11

30 Oct '11

For ages now I have been trying to find some speakers that were reasonably priced that were a step above the average offerings found for PC's. Now I will define some terms here. Reasonable price being 3 to 400 dollars. Peformance wise, my main sound system has been in use now since the very early 1980's (I think). The amp is a Pioneer A88X, still a well rspected amp. The speakers being Magnaplanar MG2A's, these are regarded by people that know them is amongst some of the best speakers ever made. The sound being clean and clear, unfortunately these cost something in the order of $1800 in the early 80's something like $6000 to $8000 now. Such level of funds one only wishes to spend once. A few years ago I purchased a 2 speaker Bose PC system this was and advance but was still not good enough. Around 6 months ago I came across a reference to speakers made by a US company called MAudio. A number of points got my interest. First is the company makes professional recording equipment. The second the speakers are fairly large and heavy for powered speakers and use wood (MDF board) cabinets. A number of reports particularly mentioning the AV30 model. I located the dealer in Melbourne and rang them, they said supply was no problem, the price being just under $300, so I picked a pair up. The speakers are of typical powered speaker construction but the size being 220x155x160 (LxWxH). I set them up on one of my systems and tried them out. Initally I was a bit so so on them, but after using them for a number of weeks it became __QUITE__ clear they were a _major_ step up, giving a good clean sound. The reason for my initial reaction is the speakers give a somewhat "brighter" sound than I am used, ie they have somewhat higher treble content. This was cured by dropping the treble control 1 and half db. I was so impressed I decided to get a second set for my development setup. I rang the dealer again to make sure they were availble. They stated that the next model up was on special for slightly under $400 if I wished to consider them. This is the BX5a. These are of similiar construction but are larger (250x175x200) have a kevlar cone on the base speaker (both Bx5a and the AV30 being two way). Also both box's are identcal both having there own electronics. I purchased a set and these were set up in place of the AV30's these being transferred to the development bench. The performance of these give an impression of being better than the AV30's. May mention all of my setups including the Magnaplanars are in differnt rooms so it is impossible for a direct comparison. The BX5a's also can put a __GREAT__ deal of sound without stressing the speakers or in any way butchering the sound. They have some dissadvantages though. The first is the Volumne controls are on the back of the speakers. The second is unlike the AV30's they have no protecting grills on the front. One thing this means is you _______MUST___BE___VERY__________ carefull if laying the speakers down on there fronts unless the surface is dead level as this can put pressure on the dome tweeter. I did have a look at the inside of the AV30's and the construction is quite good. On the whole I am quite happy with both systems, at last getting good sound from my PC's. A last point is as the speakers are designed as monitors for mixing consoles both of them have balanced inputs. the AV30's have both 1/4 inch TRS sockets and RCA sockets. The BX5a's only have the 1/4 inch socket but this will take standard 1/4 inch Tip and Sleeve mono unbalanced plug no problems. The only supplier in Melbourne is StoreDJ, 394 bridge Rd Richmond. Tram route 109 stop 22 is just out side the shop. The only connection i have with the shop is to have purchased the MAudio speakers there! Lindsay

13 27