Hello All,
I have a turntable with both analog and streaming USB outputs. It is one
from Jaycar. What audio packages do I need to be able to record the
streaming USB on Ubuntu and Debian? I have been looking, and there are
vague references in the comments about recording, but not specifically
stating that they can capture from USB.
There is a CD of Windows software, and I am hoping that I do not need to
enable something first from a Windows box. That is a SNAFU about which I
do not yet have information, but will be looking at. I am thinking along
the lines of some USB devices with the software distributed as files on
the storage side, but flippable into an "active" device mode, such as
some wireless "modems".
Regards,
Mark Trickett
I have a windows VM running under Xen, and want to take snapshots of all the LV's it is using as it's physical disks, eg:
vg0/lv0 - OS
vg0/lv1 - FILESTREAM data
vg1/lv2 - Databases
vg2/lv3 - Database Logs
vg's 0, 1, and 2 are on different sets of spindles to give higher IOPS. The problem is that the 4 snapshots need to be created atomically or else I'm going to get my database and transaction logs out of sync as there could be a few ms between the snapshot of lv2 and lv3.
I think this isn't possible based on the documentation I've read, but maybe someone here knows different?
Being Windows, I can use VSS to fudge it, but making an automatic procedure to do that in conjunction with LVM is more complicated than I want to think about right now!
Thanks
James
I'm load testing a kernel mode IPsec setup. When IKE SAs renegotiate
one or two IP packets get sent on the default route but after the
tunnel is back up the TCP connection remains stuck on the default
route by-passing xfrm policy until the TCP connection closes from
retransmission failures.
Ping is not affected the same way. It uses the tunnel as soon as a new
child SA is up (even while TCP is broken).
The next TCP connection uses the tunnel immediately.
What can I do to fix this?
Things I've tried that did not work:
- conntrack -D
- iptables -t raw ... -j NOTRACK # have verified the connections
never appear in conntrack state
- ip route cache flush # while a connection is stuck on the wrong path
Kernel is 2.6.32.
The TCP connections terminate on a loopback of the IPsec gateway.
Ideas?
A work colleague was reading a blog and in one of the comments was a
statement saying that if you append
init=/bin/bash
to the grub boot line e.g.
linux /vmlinuz-3.2.0-2-amd64
root=UUID=26585ddb-7dde-4a7e-b2c7-e32330bb4cc8 ro splash quiet
init=/bin/bash
you end up ia a shell with root privileges.
So we had go at it and it works. We even tried booting with a USB tick in
place to see if you could copy stuff to it and you can.
The question that arose was what about network access? Do you have it? i.e.
is there a tcp/ip stack running and if not how would you load one etc?
--
Colin Fee
tfeccles(a)gmail.com
I am running Debian testing and after a recent dist-upgrade networking
no longer comes up automatically after booting. eth0 doesn't come up
and more surprisingly neither does the loopback interface.
I can configure these manually after booting but would obviously like to
have the interfaces come up during boot process.
During the upgrade a new networking program 'dnet' appears to have been
installed which I suspect is related to this problem. During the
install it wanted to be configured so it could change the mac address of
my nic. Until it was configured eth0 was dead and wouldn't come up at all.
Does anyone know what's wrong and how I can fix it? I'm tempted to
uninstall dnet but it's obviously been installed for a reason. I've
googled around and haven't been able to find anything that helps with a fix.
Many thanks in advance Geoff
Hi folks,
I originally sent this to the Melbourne Free Software Interest Group,
but I reckon this would be of interest to others on this list and so
I'm reposting here. Apologies to those who get duplicates!
The US company ZaReason who build Linux systems (and are currently
investigating opening a store in New Zealand) have been working on a
fully open Android tablet for some time now. Well it's now appeared
on their website for pre-orders (unlinked from the rest of the site,
but tweeted about) here:
http://zareason.com/shop/zatab.html
I've blogged about it here:
http://www.csamuel.org/2012/04/25/the-zatab-from-zareason-a-fully-open-sour…
summarising what I've learnt from their tweets and from their site,
plus noting that the status of their GPU driver is unclear (there is
an open source driver in development, but its maturity is claimed to
be low).
The tablet ships with CyanogenMod 9 and an unlocked boot loader. I
would presume it doesn't ship with the Google Apps as they're not open.
I've asked via Twitter if they plan on having F-Droid installed by default.
Timely given the interest in free software Android devices!
cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC
This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic.
For more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP
Hi,
Yesterday, a friend of mine proceeded with the Dist Upgrade to 12.04
process within the Update Manager of his Ubuntu 11.10 (64bit) system that I
installed for him previously. (He did so before consulting me beforehand.
Had he done so, I would have advised him to do the usual things before an
upgrade, like: backup your system, etc; and I would have offered to do this
with him together, because I had just done my upgrade recently).
Well, everything was going well, until he got to the 4th point in the
Upgrade Checklist (i.e. he saw 3 ticks in the checklist):
- Preparing to upgrade
- Setting new software channels
- Getting new packages
- Installing the upgrades
- ...
Later he told me that his PC seemed to have stuck at this point for a long
time, no progress, PC seemed frozen. So he proceeded with the one option
that many of us tend to do - pressed the RESET button. While I usually
wouldn't do this myself, I can understand his rationale for doing so -
aborting the upgrade so that he could get back to where he was. Instead,
when his PC (there is no dual-boot in this machine - just pure Ubuntu)
rebooted, after going pass the usual BIOS/Video card splash screen,
followed by a quick splash of the Ubuntu logo, he got a blank screen. Not
even the usual Ubuntu boot option list was displayed - just a black screen
(with a tiny top bit coloured ubuntu purple).
Subsequent rebooting attempts (powering off & on) got the same outcome.
** A quick note about the "computer freeze up" scenario during the upgrade
before: From my own recent experience, actually the upgrade did not
"freeze", it just sit there waiting for a user response. And the only way
you can find this out is to expand the "Terminal" window within the Upgrade
Wizard/Panel - which would show a message describing the issue at hand, and
the user suppose to enter the relevant command before the whole install
process would continue. @Ubuntu: How on earth a newbie would have known
what to do in this scenario? More likely they would deem the process
'frozen' and did the next logical thing - reboot!
I had used a Live CD to boot the PC up and confirmed that all his data
(/home) is in a separate partition, so a clean install of 12.04 will not
loose his data completely. However, that would mean I have to spend lots
more time re-installing all his extra programs, installing codecs,
configuring his scanner, etc (that I'd spent many hours/days fine-tuning in
the previous 11.10 install).
So my question to the LUV'ers out there, is there a way I can do to get
back to his 11.10 version? Any tips will help as I have not done such
rescue before.
BTW, when I boot up an Ubuntu 12.04 amd64 Desktop Live CD on that PC, I
didn't see a "Rescue mode" option. Should that be in the Alternate CD, or
previous version of Ubuntu?
This posting is meant not just to seek help as mentioned above, but also to
warn those who are about to do an upgrade to 12.04 about that particular
"Terminal" window trick - to avoid any unnecessary rebooting in the middle
of an upgrade process.
Cheers,
Wen
On Mon, 14 May 2012, djitnah(a)greenwareit.com.au wrote:
> There seem to be an odd thing with Precise install. It takes a really
> long time when it gets to the language pack download/installation.
I am very surprised because doenload and installation are quite separate
things. An update only starts after a complete installation.
I have done it a few times over the last weeks, so I am quite certain.
Regards
Peter
If you see it take a long time in future then please rub "top" to see what process is at fault and file a bug report.
--
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S Android phone with K-9 Mail.
On 14/05/12 12:19, djitnah(a)greenwareit.com.au wrote:
>> On 13/05/12 17:56, Roger wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I should point out that no operating system is invulnerable from
>>>>> monkey attacks like this one. I have seen Windows, Linux, and Mac OS
>>>>> X installations b0rked due to upgrades where a monkey took control
>>>>> before it completed. Unfortunately that’s the way the cookie
>>>>> crumbles, and data recovery is probably the best long-term option.
>>> FWIW.
>>> Both Fedora and Ubuntu seem to recommend updating OS files regularly,
>>> I've seen this mentioned quite a lot over the years. I update both every
>>> few days.
>>> My daughter just yesterday updated her Ubuntu Oneiric laptop to Precise
>>> after updating to all the latest files, it took from about 4:30pm to
>>> 10:45pm to complete downloading, installing and checking the file system.
>>> Her system stopped for about 18 minutes - doing what ever it was doing,
>>> she just let it go and eventually it got going again.
>>> She googled some page or other every 5 minutes to make sure the bigpond
>>> inernet did not time out... we had that time out with the last ubuntu
>>> upgrade so she made sure it wouldn't happen again.
>>
> There seem to be an odd thing with Precise install. It takes a really long time when it gets to the language pack
> download/installation. I did a beta install a few weeks ago, and I thought it had frozen at this stage. I restarted
> and got the same thing. A few days ago it did it again with final release, but I realised that the percentage
> indicator had changed after a long time by 1% (which I had probably not notice before) - so I let it go and it
> eventually completed. I dont know how long it took, but well over 1hr, since I went away and came back a few hrs
> later. Previous ones would take about 20 mins to complete for me.
That's interesting.. I've found the upgrade to be quite
straightforward.. think it took a little over half an hour.
My main desktop is far from a straightforward setup, too -- it's been
through multiple Ubuntu versions with a lot of customisation and a dozen
PPAs enabled.
Toby