Firmware remote vulnerability in Intel business products
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Intel's Management Technology is indeed vulnerable
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 19:49:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: I love OpenBSD <lampshade(a)poczta.fm>
To: misc(a)openbsd.org
INTEL-SA-00075
There is an escalation of privilege vulnerability in Intel® Active Management Technology (AMT), Intel® Standard Manageability (ISM), and Intel® Small Business Technology versions firmware versions 6.x, 7.x, 8.x 9.x, 10.x, 11.0, 11.5, and 11.6 that can allow an unprivileged attacker to gain control of the manageability features provided by these products.
Can I preview a bitlink before clicking on it?
https://support.bitly.com/hc/en-us/articles/230650447-Can-I-preview-a-bitli…
Arstechnica:
http://bit.ly/2qyHCQn
Semiaccurate:
http://bit.ly/2pB2MjO
Intel's PDF:
http://intel.ly/2qAK4G0
Hello,
Just wondering what a good cordless VOIP solution is?
Last time I asked somewhere, the Gigaset was recommended. Think I might
have the C610 IIRC (can't see how to double check). However I am now
finding that the batteries don't last - possibly due to memory affect. I
tried getting more expensive AA batteries, but it hasn't helped.
Seems like this might be a common problem, seems like the recommendation
is not to leave the phones on the chargers. Which means trying to manage
when batteries are going flat and recharge them before they go dead
flat. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r27397159-Gigaset-C610H-Batteries~start=30
Looking at Gigaset's website, I am somewhat overwealmed with choices,
and there doesn't seem to be any easy way of identifying the differences
between the different model numbers. e.g. what does the C, E, S, SL, CL
prefix mean. Or if any have better battery solutions then what I already
have.
http://www.gigaset.com/hq_en/telephones/voip-phones/
So was wondering if anybody could suggest alternate solutions?
Thanks
--
Brian May <brian(a)linuxpenguins.xyz>
https://linuxpenguins.xyz/brian/
