If any of you might want to go this meeting if it was on another date I'd suggest you point that out ASAP. But as I can't see a link to email on the website http://retro.asn.au/ I'm Bcc: ing this to a co-convenor. Either he can tell me an email to post (won't be for some days) or he can check luv-talk(a)luv.asn.au for comments or I'll check for comments in a few days.
I always recommend groups go for the last *day of the month because sometimes that's the 4th & sometimes the 5th which could mean some folk can get there who otherwise never could. But nearly everyone goes for the first 3 weeks of the month.
Dav(e/id/o/y)
Will Romney become god of his own universe? www.mormonthink.com
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Someone <info(a)ameri.me> wrote:
> Of course, the Enlightened!
Please reply to the list and address the issue of why the possibly mind-
controlling team is a better fit than the Resistance given the way we oppose MS
etc.
Note that I don't have strong feelings either way, but we need to make a
decision on this if we are to be on the same team.
It seems that Google have designed this to have the difference between the
teams be fairly ambiguous.
--
My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 17:26 +1100, Roger wrote:
> History is now history of Asia and aborigines, not history of Australia.
That is appropriate. Remember that all the "First Fleet" people,
convicts and authorities, were "boat people" invading an already settled
and occupied land, just not a European settlement. Except for those of
"Aboriginal" ancestry, we are all either boat people or immigrants, or
the descendants of such.
Australia is geographically part of Asia, not Europe. A knowledge of the
"local" history is a good thing, although I would also strongly
recommend a breadth of global history as a good background.
Mark Trickett
Hello,
I have inherited responsibility for a LDAP user management system
written in Python/Django:
https://github.com/VPAC/django-placard
In my rewrite come across a sticky problem: how do I reliably and
efficiently allocate unique uidNumber for new users and gidNumber of
new groups?
The current solution, as used by my predecessor, is to list every user
or group in the system, sort or scan though the list looking for the
highest id, add 1, and use that.
Unfortunately, this seems to be lacking in efficiency (specially if
there are a lot of users) and relying on the hope that two users will
never be created at the same time. Race conditions could occur.
Only solution I can think of is to create a special server that
atomically allocates ids. Seems a lot of work for something so simple.
Any ideas for other solutions?
(not sure if this is on-topic or not for luv-main, so posting here
just to be safe)
Thanks
--
Brian May <brian(a)microcomaustralia.com.au>
Hi,
2 things make me think that Google has forgotten (well...perhaps never
really had it any way....perhaps it was BS all along) their Don't be Evil
mantra lately:
1. Why present me with a dialogue box when I was checking out the "Dumb
Ways to Die" vid on doobie toob that asked why I did not want to use my
real name?
(Without any way to tell them where to stick it!)
2. Why do they pay less tax in Oz by more than half than what my company
does?
Say what?
Don't be Evil?
Really?
BW
Roger <arelem(a)bigpond.com> wrote:
> From next year, every teacher from sport, English, math and science and
> social sciences will have to teach IT.
And the rationale for this is what exactly? (assuming that it's true - I
haven't looked at any references).
I emerged from primary school having been taught typing and basic word
processing on the computers of the era. This was all primary school-level
material and considered such.
> History is now history of Asia and aborigines, not history of Australia.
I remind you that Aboriginal history is an important element of Australian
history, so half of what you said above is in fact "history of Australia".
History when I was at school covered mostly Europe, proceeding from Greek and
Roman civilizations through to the industrial revolution and, finally, the
twentieth century up to the collapse of the Soviet Union, which was everywhere
in the news in 1989-90 just as we were studying the cold war in
secondary school history classes.
So far as I can recall, Asia wasn't mentioned at all throughout, except in
connection with Japan in World War II. I think that's a very serious omission,
given Australia's geographical proximity to south east Asia, immigration
patterns, social and economic relations, etc. Of course, it might have been
rectified had I studied history in years 11 and 12, but I didn't.
> They're not even maintaining the illusion. Grammar is off the table as
> is spelling.
So primary school children won't be quizzed about common nouns, proper nouns,
abstract nouns, collective nouns, etc.? It wasn't exciting; nor was it
particularly useful. I learned more about grammar by studying a second
language than I did in English class. That's probably because it wasn't taught
either very well or very systematically. Spelling was covered, though, and it
is important - again, as a primary school topic.
Roger,
> History is now history of Asia and aborigines, not history of Australia.
Could you elaborate on what you mean by the above statement? Surely you
must acknowledge that the aboriginal people are, by definition, a
significant part of the history of Australia?
All the best,
--
Lev Lafayette, mobile: 0432 255 208
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
Trent W. Buck <trentbuck(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Russell Coker <russell(a)coker.com.au> writes:
> > Part of the issue of Li-Ion battery life depends on how fully it is charged
> > and how fully it is discharged.
>
> Granted.
I thought Li-Ion batteries were designed not to suffer from the "memory
effect". Is that a myth?
> If the devices support user-servicable batteries, than I concede the
> point. IME tablets do not have that property.
Is there a legitimate reason why not or is it a case of planned obsolescence
(most undesirable from an environmental point of view and costly to the
purchasor over the long run).
At the very least it creates an industry for repair technicians who can
install new batteries for people who can't do it themselves.
Russell Coker <russell(a)coker.com.au> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, "Trent W. Buck" <trentbuck(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > English lit, now that is a subject that's pure child-minding. Should go
> > back to teaching rhetoric and grammar.
>
> The subject "English" should be about blogging, email, twitter, SMS, and
> writing technical documents - with probably about that order of importance.
Reading literature is valuable; so is essay writing for anyone who studies the
humanities/social sciences. (Even in the natural sciences, beyond a certain
point one has to be able to write papers/theses/dissertations).
>
> > > If we are going to maintain the illusion that school is teaching
> > > skills that are relevant to work then we should be able to have
> > > schools implement practices that work in a commercial environment.
> >
> > So... how to spend all day on facebook while pretending to use word?
> > They cover that in the "IT" classes.
That's laughable indeed.
I think there's an important role for serious school education intended to
prepare people for rigorous academic study at university.