On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au> wrote:
one of the primary differences between american style Libertarianism (aka anarcho-capitalism) and the above is that anarcho-capitalists believe that wealth (or more correctly, control over the means of production) entitles someone to economically enslave other people, and that such slavery is GOOD for everyone involved and good for society. libertarian socialists disagree, vehemently.
http://theyesmen.org/hijinks/wharton The Yes Men gave a good lecture about this. Warning, the above URL contains satire (some people here might not recognise it).
let's see, do you have the trifecta - do you believe that there is a conspiracy involving Prince Philip and the World Wildlife Federation to depopulate the world? That "environmentalism" is just a code-word for "genocide"?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reptoid You forgot to mention the Reptoids.
All of which are forms of intervention in the market by governments.
as are: copyrights, patents, property laws, national borders, passports, health and safety regulations, financial regulations, stock markets, limitation of liability for companies, granting of corporate charters, legal recognition of corporations as "persons", and millions of other things.
In the US conservative/libertarian/tea-bagger world view those things are natural rights. It's like the way owning a gun is a natural right that can't be denied to a criminal or a blind person, but health-care isn't a right is a privilege that you might be able to pay for. On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Paul Holt <pcholt@gmail.com> wrote:
breach of the Brad And Angelina Act (2008), specifically subsection 5.2
Why Brangelina? -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/