23 Nov
2012
23 Nov
'12
11:02 p.m.
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Aryan Ameri <info(a)ameri.me> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Brent Wallis
<brent.wallis(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
http://www.theage.com.au/it-pro/business-it/turnbull-queries-google-tax-bil…
There is a difference between legit minimisation and out and out theft.
My company paid over $190,000 in tax last FY (a properly accounted for
"minimised" amount within the letter of the law) with revenues that are
miniscule compared with Googles in this country.
Google paid around $70,000 ?
Sure, its within the law, but is it Fair?
BW
2. Why do they pay less tax in Oz by more than half than what my company
does?
Say what?
Don't be Evil?
Really?
Well, I thought not paying more tax than you should is sign of how things
should be.
In fact, I vaguely remember somewhere reading that directors of a public
company have a responsibility to not waste money unnecessarily, something
about corporate responsibility in the Corporations Act (2001) or something
like that...