Re: Size of LUV - was Re: The End of LUV, Inc?

On 25/08/13 6:06 PM, Russell Coker wrote:

There is no possibility for avoiding duplicate insurance without becoming an LA subcommittee. Insurance and resource sharing are certainly two valid reasons to explore the disincorporation/merger proposal. I have an open mind on this, but the arguments have swung my thoughts more towards being in favour of the proposal. Most members of LUV would disagree with that. I expect that most members consider the existance of LUV to be determined by the mailing lists running and the meetings being held. I'd certainly like to see the "LUV" name go on in some fashion, even if not officially (legally) in existence.

-- 73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL http://vkradio.com