Lev, you say that this will be discussed at the AGM, yet the rest of your email (beginning
"what will change") reads as though disincorporation is a decided matter.
Personally I much rather prefer a decentralised, horizontal structure and more powerful
localised bodies and do not see any worthwhile regional or personal gain from such a
merger.
Having said that, MLUG will no doubt fit that model very well and be there to carry on for
a local group of people more interested in Linux fun than political overhead.
Also, I can't make it physically to the AGM (and tbh don't feel all that strongly
on the subject to sit through a committee meeting), but will there be a participatory
webinar feed?
Daniel
Lev Lafayette <lev(a)levlafayette.com> wrote:
In a few weeks, Linux Users of Victoria, Inc., will be
holding another
Annual General Meeting. But this one is somewhat different to others.
At
this meeting, the very existence of LUV as an independent organisation
may
come to an end. A motion is on the agenda that LUV dis-incorporates and
merges into Linux Australia, Inc., as a subcommittee of that group. It
is
an issue which I personally have given some serious thought to over the
past several months, and more fleeting consideration over the past few
years.
LUV is one of the the oldest (since 1993), most active (three speakers
per
month), and largest (c1500 members) Linux organisations in the world.
We
have been a mainstay behind such events as Software Freedom Day,
install-fests, regional mini-conferences, and of course, our regular
beginners workshops and technical talks. All of this, one hastens to
add,
will not change at all with the proposed dis-incorporation.
What will change is that LUV will not be an independent organisation.
Our
assets, such as they are, will be transferred to Linux Australia, in
accordance to the Act governing Incorporated Associations in Victoria.
Our
income and expenditure will also be legally part of Linux Australia as
well, although that body has indicated that there is some room for
autonomy in those areas. At the very least, Linux events in Victoria
that
require funding could go directly to the national body, rather than to
the
state one which tends to have somewhat more meagre financial resources.
An
example would be the establishment of more regional chapters.
We will be part of a national organisation and will be able to have
more
direct input into country-wide affairs, including national policy, as
they
are related to Linux. Our administrative overhead, which it is admitted
is
not particularly onerous, should also decline. Plus, there are
significant
economies of scale and of network scope in being part of a larger
group.
One also hopes that we will see people who have hitherto been more
involved in Linux Australia from Victoria, participating in activities
of
the Victorian subcommittee of LA.
Overall however, it must be noted that Linux Australia is a unitary
body,
not a federal one. Members of the committee of Linux Australia are
elected
from the membership as a whole, not as nominees from the respective
subcommittees and, as subcommittees only exist with the approval of the
LA
committee, they could be disbanded in part or entirely, at any time.
The
circumstances that this would arise would indeed be quite
extraordinary,
but it is certainly something that must be considered.
I admit that I am much more in favour of bottom-up, federalist
organisations (e.g., a national committee from regional LUGs), rather
than
those of the unitary model (e.g., a national organisation with local
subcommittees). I also acknowledge the substantial benefits that arise
through being part of a larger organisations. Whilst Linux Australia is
a
product of its own history and perhaps does not represent what I
consider
the most optimal organisational structure, especially for an interest
which is primarily the result of of the energy of local volunteer
activists. There is of course the possibility that LA may consider
changing its organisational structure over time.
Still, if this does mean the end of LUV, Inc. we can certainly be very
proud of what has been achieved under our name in the past twenty
years.
LUV was there, from the very beginning of Linux, when a rag-tag team of
wild-eyed volunteer coders declared that they could take on the
massive,
multi-billion dollar proprietary operating systems, by opening the code
to
all, by making it free to modify and to distribute, and produce
something
that was technically superior by any meaningful metric. That was truly
revolutionary.
LUV, Inc.? You're a superstar.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_zLBsRYD8w
--
Lev Lafayette, BA (Hons), GCertPM, MBA
mobile: 0432 255 208
RFC 1855 Netiquette Guidelines
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
luv-main(a)luv.asn.au
http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.