On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 04:34:40PM +1100, Joel W. Shea via luv-main wrote:
http://lists.luv.asn.au/pipermail/luv-talk/2015-November/003584.html
In that thread, I have attempted to convince the list administrator to use dmarc_moderation_action *instead of* from_is_list, as recommended by the Mailman documentation; effectively only rewriting the "From:" field where necessary, and I believe that's an acceptable compromise to many more people than the current solution.
that's a not-unreasonable compromise. it only mangles messages where the alternative would be to have it bounce or be discarded....and, most importantly, doesn't munge other messages where DMARC is not an issue.
Only where the message has been sent from a domain with a restrictive DMARC policy like dmarc_moderation_action does; not every single message, as from_is_list does.
i'm in favour of it, as a compromise. i'd prefer not to mangle mail just to pander to giant corporations broken non-standards, but at least dmarc_moderation_action seems to do minimal damage. craig -- craig sanders <cas@taz.net.au>