On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 04:34:40PM +1100, Joel W. Shea via luv-main wrote:
In that thread, I have attempted to convince the list administrator to
use dmarc_moderation_action *instead of* from_is_list, as recommended by
the Mailman documentation; effectively only rewriting the "From:" field
where necessary, and I believe that's an acceptable compromise to many
more people than the current solution.
that's a not-unreasonable compromise. it only mangles messages where
the alternative would be to have it bounce or be discarded....and, most
importantly, doesn't munge other messages where DMARC is not an issue.
Only where the message has been sent from a domain
with a restrictive
DMARC policy like dmarc_moderation_action does; not every single
message, as from_is_list does.
i'm in favour of it, as a compromise. i'd prefer not to mangle
mail just to pander to giant corporations broken non-standards,
but at least dmarc_moderation_action seems to do minimal damage.
craig sanders <cas(a)taz.net.au>