I'm currently completing a survey for someone's psychology research. One of the questions is "I would never try to get away with using pay-for-use WiFi Internet access if I hadn't actually paid for it". I've done more than a few surveys and it's the first time I've seen a question like that! IP over DNS works almost everywhere and the "iodine" implementation while a little clunky works well. It also gives you more than 20 minutes at McDonalds. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/
Russell Coker wrote:
I'm currently completing a survey for someone's psychology research. One of the questions is "I would never try to get away with using pay-for-use WiFi Internet access if I hadn't actually paid for it".
I've done more than a few surveys and it's the first time I've seen a question like that!
Because of [1] ? IME there is no dearth of poorly-worded questionnaires... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Questionnaire_construction#Questionnaire_const...
IP over DNS works almost everywhere and the "iodine" implementation while a little clunky works well. It also gives you more than 20 minutes at McDonalds.
...which is (one reason) why the captive portal approach is dumb. (Accessibility is another.)
On Wed, 23 May 2012, "Trent W. Buck" <trentbuck@gmail.com> wrote:
I've done more than a few surveys and it's the first time I've seen a question like that!
Because of [1] ? IME there is no dearth of poorly-worded questionnaires...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Questionnaire_construction#Questionnaire_con struction_issues
Yes, the double-negative questions were rather annoying. But it also seemed to assume more knowledge of computer security than most people posess. "I would steal a space-shuttle for a joy-ride if I could get away with it" would have almost as much relevance for most people. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/
participants (2)
-
Russell Coker -
Trent W. Buck