17 Apr
2016
17 Apr
'16
9:48 p.m.
I just received a spam message (one of those "earn thousands from doing almost
no work at home" ones) from a member of this list. Apparently spammers took
over his account and either saw messages from me in his inbox or saw a public
record of LUV list correspondence.
The message in question was DKIM signed which proves that the user in question
had their Gmail account compromised. I've just sent them private mail
informing them.
--
My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/
18 Apr
18 Apr
12:07 a.m.
Russell Coker via luv-talk wrote:
I just received a spam message (one of those
"earn thousands from doing almost
no work at home" ones) from a member of this list. Apparently spammers took
over his account and either saw messages from me in his inbox or saw a public
record of LUV list correspondence.
The message in question was DKIM signed which proves that the user in question
had their Gmail account compromised. I've just sent them private mail
informing them.
Russell;
so this is definitely NOT the kind of email malware;
which uses the victim's address-book to fake it's ,
originating address ?
ie It doesn't use the victim's email address !
regards Rohan McLeod
9:02 p.m.
Hello All,
On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 21:48 +1000, Russell Coker via luv-talk wrote:
I just received a spam message (one of those
"earn thousands from doing almost
no work at home" ones) from a member of this list. Apparently spammers took
over his account and either saw messages from me in his inbox or saw a public
record of LUV list correspondence.
The message in question was DKIM signed which proves that the user in question
had their Gmail account compromised. I've just sent them private mail
informing them.
It was my account, I had a very ambiguous email from my brother. I am
trying to deal with residual financials from my father's estate, he died
in Nov 2011. As a result I did try to look at the source, and make sense
of, but the link was very ambiguous. The whole was too real to ignore,
given the situation. It was perhaps, from the spammers point of view, a
particularly fortuitous composition. Any who have had, please do not
visit the link, but I would like to know more about what it decodes to,
and what is there. I would wish to terminate the service, with
prejudice.
Regards,
Mark Trickett
2532
days inactive
2533
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Mark Trickett -
Rohan McLeod -
Russell Coker