Clarifying the decision to upgrade 'fibre-to-the-node to fibre-to-the-home
Hello Rohan, On 9/23/20, Rohan McLeod via luv-talk <luv-talk@luv.asn.au> wrote:
I would just like to clarify the recent decision to upgrade, the 100 Mb/s 'fibre-to-the-node, to 1Gb/s fibre-to-the-home. What many of these left leaning anarchist commentators seem incapable of understanding, is that when the ALP proposed this, they wickedly sought to burden the poor taxpayer with yet another tax. But what the Liberal government is proposing is an upgrade to provide higher capacity, for companies and individuals who need more.
Whatever, it is a national infrastructure. Unfortunately Tony Abbot sabotaged the deployment on the word of his wealthy business mates who were going to be left with stranded assets. Despite promises of faster and faster and cheaper, it cost a lot more, took a lot longer, and was significantly slower. It would also be better as a public venture for life, not necessarily to be run at a loss, but with any surplus further funding civil society rather than already overly wealthy executives who unduly rely on their "Personal Assistants" who actually do the real work for less than a tenth of the salary of the executive.
Where would we be without Malcolm Turnbull 's technological vision ? :-)
Just because we can do is not a good enough reason that we should do unquestioningly. Whether to do or not, and quite how if we do proceed, needs a lot more thought and consideration than is usual today. Some things are done in a suitable fashion, some that should be done are "left on the shelf", and too much that should not be started goes ahead with unseemly haste and greed. Regards, Mark Trickett
On Wednesday, 23 September 2020 5:51:00 PM AEST Rohan McLeod via luv-talk wrote:
I would just like to clarify the recent decision to upgrade, the 100 Mb/s 'fibre-to-the-node, to 1Gb/s fibre-to-the-home.What many of these left leaning anarchist commentators seem incapable of understanding,is that when the ALP proposed this, they wickedly sought to burden the poor taxpayer with yet another tax.But what the Liberal government is proposing is an upgrade to provide higher capacity, for companies and individuals who need more.Where would we be without Malcolm Turnbull 's technological vision ? :-)
Labor was planning for $37B, Liberal claimed that they would cut the cost to $29B but instead increased it to $51B. https://etbe.coker.com.au/2010/02/17/can-the-nbn-ever-break-even/ The NBN can never be a profit making enterprise unless the construction costs are significantly marked down (at least 75% of the cost written off). That would mean about $37B of tax payer money written off. I would just like to clarify that I don't object to Liberal policies due to being some sort of left leaning anarchist. I object to Liberal policies because I understand maths and business while Liberal politicians either lack knowledge of both those things or lie all the time. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/
Rohan McLeod via luv-talk wrote:
<html> <head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> I would just like to clarify the recent decision to upgrade,<br> the 100 Mb/s 'fibre-to-the-node, to 1Gb/s fibre-to-the-home.<br> What many of these left leaning anarchist commentators seem incapable of understanding,<br> is that when the ALP proposed this, they wickedly sought to burden the poor taxpayer with yet another tax.<br>
If you think the Australian Labor Party are left, you need your Overton window checked: https://www.politicalcompass.org/aus2019 (requires js, biased, anglocentric) Background reading, doesn't predict the rise of FANG-sponsored nationalist xenophobia: http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2010/12/invaders-from-mars.html http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2013/02/political-failure-modes-...
But what the Liberal government is proposing is an upgrade to provide higher capacity,<br> for companies and individuals who need more.<br> Where would we be without Malcolm Turnbull <span><span class="_33vv"><span class="_kao"></span></span></span>'s technological vision ? <span class="moz-smiley-s1"><span>:-)</span></span><br> <br> </body> </html>
_______________________________________________ luv-talk mailing list luv-talk@luv.asn.au https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-talk
participants (4)
-
Mark Trickett -
Rohan McLeod -
Russell Coker -
Trent W. Buck