Re: [luv-talk] Fake Wikipedia entry on Bicholim Conflict finally deleted after five years

Since no one has mentioned it yet: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia My favourite part is this block quotation: WebMD is the only news source whose coverage of chemical risk is regarded as accurate by a majority (56 percent) of toxicologists, closely followed by Wikipedia's 45 percent accuracy rating. By contrast, only 15 percent describe as accurate the portrayals of chemical risk found in the New York Times, Washington Post, and Wall Street Journal.^[6]