16 Jun
2013
16 Jun
'13
3:05 a.m.
Russell Coker wrote:
.............snip Among other things he asks whether failing to donate to a charity to save a child's life is equivalent to walking past a child dying in the street and doing nothing. Of course the real life decision is made more complex because there is no legislative requirement for a charity to reveal how much of one's donation will actually go to the child and how much is retained for 'in-house expenditure'; I seem to recall an notorious case (something to do with guide-dogs?); where > 80% was retained by the organisation !
regards Rohan McLeod