6 Nov
2013
6 Nov
'13
6:54 a.m.
Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au> wrote:
it's about jobs, it's about livelihoods, it's about the workforce's - the union's membership - ability to feed, clothe and house themselves and their families.
Indeed, that's the nub of the matter. In the cases under discussion in this thread, if I'm interpreting correctly, nobody's livelihood would be adversely affected by new software and new user interfaces with the same functionality as the existing systems. In general, though, Craig's observations are exactly on point.