8 Mar
2013
8 Mar
'13
4:07 a.m.
On 8/03/2013 3:02 PM, Lev Lafayette wrote:
Laws need to be written in such a way that they cannot be considered ambiguous and therefore no interpretation is required, nor is an alternate interpretation possible. The judgement can then be clear -- has the law been broken or not (by the letter of the law)?
Whilst language is intersubjective that will remain impossible.
Not impossible, but it would be an art and it needs to be practiced well by the legislators. It can also be part of the reason why laws go back and forth under review in order to get it right; as best can be determined at that time by those doing the review. A.