Hello Russell and Rohan, On 10/1/16, Russell Coker via luv-talk <luv-talk@luv.asn.au> wrote:
On Saturday, 1 October 2016 8:28:22 PM AEST Rohan McLeod via luv-talk wrote:
David via luv-talk wrote:
On 1 October 2016 at 18:21, Rohan McLeod via luv-talk
<luv-talk@luv.asn.au> wrote:
Michael Lindner via luv-jobs wrote: Now we have this spam on two lists.
Please don't quote spam and retransmit it.
Well perhaps I should have contacted Rick off-list in my query to him; but are you seriously suggesting spam problems can't be addressed on luv-talk ?; Perhaps the moderator of luv-talk can arbitrate on this ?
The best thing to do for that sort of thing is to notify the LUV committee. I think that the luv-jobs list is moderated for non-members so probably someone on the committee approved the wrong message by mistake.
I seem to remember seeing a committee member caught by such a link, as have I. A good discussion should help with understanding and recognising such, and less falling for. I am wondering whether it would be safe to use wget on the link, with a careful use of headers, and limiting recursion/dependent pages, and a careful inspection. I would like to see the host machines taken down suitably. Everybody needs to make a living, but not unethically. Providing ethical opportunities is part of the solution, at least in the long term. Regards, Mark Trickett