On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Brent Wallis <brent.wallis@gmail.com> wrote:
Some of us in this world do not feel the need to brag via some no-name blog. Nor do we feel the need to promote such in our email sigs.
I've had my blog URL in my .sig for a number of years. This is the second occasion that I've been criticised for doing so. In both cases it was after a hostile discussion, presumably heavily based on someone's need to flame me for something. I've also had a number of people thank me for my blogging after following the link in my .sig. This is most common when someone asks me for help on a technical matter and then finds other useful technical information in my blog. By convention a .sig is 4 or fewer lines that are slightly less than 80 characters long in which the author of a message can put whatever they wish and as long as they aren't offensive there's no other requirements. My .sig is 2 lines that are significantly less than 80 characters and the content is useful to some people and of no relevance to the rest.
You are a pusillanimous little il-informed turd!
You and your ill-informed rat brained wantoks are what ill's us in this world.
In short: Fuck u you bigoted no-name know-it-all inexperienced ass-hole!
If you want to have a discussion of narcissism then one thing you REALLY don't want to do is to flame people who disagree with you. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/