26 Jan
2013
26 Jan
'13
12:43 p.m.
On 26/01/2013 9:55 PM, Mark Trickett wrote:
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/exclusive-billionair...
That's quite propaganderous, (okay I made a word up, so sue me), to say the least. There is no reason why both sides of the argument can't have reasonable funding; both sides have their own agendas. There's plenty of money support the pro agenda, why not have a fair amount for the opposite side of the debate? Nothing in the above link gives me reason to believe that the sources I choose to trust are compromised. CHeers A.