-------------------------------------------- On Wed, 18/12/13, Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> wrote: Subject: Re: [luv-talk] ISP alters attachments To: luv-talk@lists.luv.asn.au Received: Wednesday, 18 December, 2013, 12:42 AM SNIP Strangely some people think that infected email should be disinfected (modified) and sent on. I think that ideally it should be rejected with a SMTP 55x code and if that fails it should be discarded. If you know the message is bad then the recipient should never see it. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Maybe the best practice would be to send a message reporting that a message from say spankyhamy@spamspamspam.oink was infected & therefore discarded? Otherwise it's a sort of stealthy censorship, just like whenever I reveal that the real people controlling everything are lawyers their name is removed from the sentence & replaced by "lawyers" (I bet it happens in that sentence too!) (Sorry about the top post before, I forgot to adjust to the sub-culture.) Dav(e/id/o/y) I believe it is long overdue for lawyers, economists, writers & politicians to understand that ignorance of the law(s of physics) is no excuse! (BTW I check same title@Gmail.com more often)