16 Nov
2015
16 Nov
'15
7:13 a.m.
For me the addition adds clarity - easier to read and shows that something is happening - maybe on a journey - i.e. not necessarily final ... Mike On 16/11/15 18:02, Anders Holmström via luv-talk wrote:
On 2015-11-16 06:26, Tim Connors via luv-talk wrote:
[...] And my LUV folder is now fugly with redundant department of redundancy style redundant information that everyone is from "via luv-talk".
+1 Adding "via luv-list" is a mistake, regardless of the merits, or otherwise, of munging the headers. I understand it's a way of saying "look! I've screwed with the headers" but is not necessary.
Anders _______________________________________________ luv-talk mailing list luv-talk@luv.asn.au http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-talk