Lev Lafayette wrote:
On Sun, April 12, 2015 10:24 pm, Rohan McLeod wrote:
Alright this is simply a semantic matter; you call this a value judgement; I don't ; we can go round this circle all day. "This type of computer is the one we should all use"; is a "value judgement about an objective phenomena" This type of statement is (I am claiming) difficult or impossible to falsify ! Isn't the difference between 1.1 kgs and 1.5 kgs a question of values? Specifically, weight?
Not in the above sense !
Well if they were written down I would say they are objective; if they are spoken it would be possible they can be recorded, so potentially objective but if no objective evidence exists of them how can we be sure they are shared ? ; therefore I would consider them subjective Even though multiple people are involved, and the matter concerns agreements, not individual tastes? Wouldn't that make them intersubjective and shared?
I have to repeat" how do we know they are shared, without objective evidence ? regards Rohan