10 Jun
2014
10 Jun
'14
12:29 a.m.
Rohan McLeod wrote:
Jason White wrote:
I think we're talking about the same thing. It would need to be shown that some other form of language processing can consistently perform better than just supplying your "natural language" query as input to the existing search engine.
Yes certainly; but surely the irrelevance of many search results indicates improvement is possible ?
Seems to me that simply indicates that the incentive of most principals is to return "irrelevant" results. Even excluding SEOs, Google itself would return nothing but ads if that wouldn't drive away their product.