
9 Jun
2014
9 Jun
'14
11:10 a.m.
Jason White wrote:
Rohan McLeod <rhn@jeack.com.au> wrote:
.....................snip They would have to perform consistently better than Google's own query processing algorithms to be worthwhile though.
Jason; just so I'm sure we are talking about the same thing; the issue I am concerned with is translating a natural language search query, into the Google search string, which most economically returns the required result. Not setting up some alternative to Google's search algorithm ! Yes ? regards Rohan McLeod