
9 Jun
2014
9 Jun
'14
11:17 a.m.
Rohan McLeod <rhn@jeack.com.au> wrote:
Jason; just so I'm sure we are talking about the same thing; the issue I am concerned with is translating a natural language search query, into the Google search string, which most economically returns the required result. Not setting up some alternative to Google's search algorithm ! Yes ?
I think we're talking about the same thing. It would need to be shown that some other form of language processing can consistently perform better than just supplying your "natural language" query as input to the existing search engine.