So, basically, you're an evangelical, non-Southern-USA-psychotic
subtype, who doesn't like mean things being said about evangelicalism
(which you somehow conflate with evangelism, which of course is NOT the
same thing), because you might somehow feel slighted. Why am I not
surprised?

So you've decided who I am, what I am, from that very short response to you?

No, I wouldn't call myself "evangelical". I simply took you to task on YOUR opinions of the Bible, and Russell on his conclusions from the article.

Up until your summary of the Bible I applauded you (mostly), but as I said, you seemed to have all the answers, just as Russel seemed to have a great knowledge of Christianity, rom his childhood.

I, too, applaud Trent, in his taking Russell to task on his conclusions from the article..

_______________________________________________
luv-talk mailing list
luv-talk@luv.asn.au
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-talk