Not really, not a big stretch; in fact, there's no need to employ imagination, just memory. Material handouts often end up filling pockets of corrupt officials - it works same way for government aid, quasi-government organisations (those run by UN) and many charities. Fred Hollows' outcome is tangible; UNHCR's aren't. Regards Slav -----Original Message----- From: luv-talk-bounces@lists.luv.asn.au [mailto:luv-talk-bounces@lists.luv.asn.au] On Behalf Of Petros Aid as coming from the Fred Hollows Foundation, Medicians Without Borders, Plan or UNHCR are examples of charity work that actually help. It needs a stretch of imagination to argue that they responsible for keeping people in poverty und hunger. "This e-mail and any attachments to it (the "Communication") is, unless otherwise stated, confidential, may contain copyright material and is for the use only of the intended recipient. If you receive the Communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete the Communication and the return e-mail, and do not read, copy, retransmit or otherwise deal with it. Any views expressed in the Communication are those of the individual sender only, unless expressly stated to be those of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited ABN 11 005 357 522, or any of its related entities including ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited (together "ANZ"). ANZ does not accept liability in connection with the integrity of or errors in the Communication, computer virus, data corruption, interference or delay arising from or in respect of the Communication."