Hello Craig,

On 5/28/19, Craig Sanders via luv-talk <luv-talk@luv.asn.au> wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 01:25:04PM +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote:
>> Craig Sanders via luv-talk wrote:
>> > The best answer to advertising is the firing squad.
>>
>> Not very effective against corporate persons.
>
> it would, however, discourage real persons from working in advertising for
> corporate non-persons.
>
> the firing squad should also, of course, apply to those giving instructions
> to or soliciting advertising personenel.

Sometimes they merely provide us with information of products and
availability that is very useful, but when they overpromote and
oversell, then they definitely need it fed back to them, several
orders of magnitude more in quantity, and even more dubious quality.
For the executives, their next meals, indefinitely, should be plates
of cash, to be eaten, and very much not to purchase food. There are
ways of providing salutory lessons, especially if they can divert the
future generations from such counterproductive activities.

The other thought would be to put them on a prison farm, where what
they eat, wear and any accommodation is solely the results of their
physical efforts. Make it more so, then all the "tools" and
"implements" are what they can fashion by hand from what grows and the
soil and such. Back to the stone age, without being taught how to knap
an edge, and probably no suitable stone.

> craig

Regards,

Mark Trickett
_______________________________________________
luv-talk mailing list
luv-talk@luv.asn.au
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-talk