
Chris Samuel said,
Out of interest, why build such an old kernel for this?
If you're after the latest ACPI code you'd want to try a 3.10 kernel (or from Linus's tree if you want to test what will be 3.11).
Several reasons, when doing any work in a new area, ie research work, in this case 64bit, one should __ALWAYS__ work from a known starting point. In this case 3.7.9 was the last kernel I had compiled that I knew worked. Second point is this particular machines main purpose is a development platform for a real time 3D terrain simulation and uses the NVidia closed source driver. One needs to tread I little carefully on new versions of this (same with the AMD driver). I had trouble getting the version I am using working with a later kernel (3.8 series). I am not really interested in ACPI execpt it gives trouble on this particular machine, given the machines primary use low power consumption is a non issue. Sitting right next to it is another machine of good deal lower specs that is used for normal every day work. This message is being writen on it. It would probably be a good idea to try a latter kernel from the 3.10 series (or what ever) to see if the ACPI issue has been sorted, the MB chips set (the X79) being fairly new. I will probably do this in time. Using Linux for 20 years, kernel 0.96d being the first one, Lindsay

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 05:46:20AM +1000, zlinw@mcmedia.com.au wrote:
Second point is this particular machines main purpose is a development platform for a real time 3D terrain simulation and uses the NVidia closed source driver. One needs to tread I little carefully on new versions of this (same with the AMD driver). I had trouble getting the version I am using working with a later kernel (3.8 series).
FYI, the latest nvidia-kernel-dkms package version 325.15-1 (in debian experimental) compiles and works with linux 3.10 (packaged as linux-image-3.10-2-amd64) previous nvidia versions were incompatible with 3.10, wouldn't compile. i upgraded to nvidia 325.15 and linux 3.10 about a week ago, has been running with no problems on 3 different machines (with GTX-560, 560Ti, and GT-240 cards).
I am not really interested in ACPI execpt it gives trouble on this particular machine, given the machines primary use low power consumption is a non issue. Sitting right next to it is another machine of good deal lower specs that is used for normal every day work. This message is being writen on it.
OTOH, it's always better to have things working correctly than to have them half working or partially disabled.
It would probably be a good idea to try a latter kernel from the 3.10
yep. craig -- craig sanders <cas@taz.net.au>

On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 05:46:20 AM zlinw@mcmedia.com.au wrote:
I am not really interested in ACPI execpt it gives trouble on this particular machine, given the machines primary use low power consumption is a non issue.
ACPI is a lot more than just power management these days, it can be used for enumeration of processors, memory, IRQ's, etc. You could try booting with acpi=off to completely disable it, or if you wanted to get more fine grained have a look at Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt and see the options starting with acpi=, there's a couple of pages of them. :-) Glad to hear your 3.7.9 kernel works and given what you said I can understand why you've chosen to go that way. All the best! Chris -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic. For more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP
participants (3)
-
Chris Samuel
-
Craig Sanders
-
zlinw@mcmedia.com.au