FW: Delivery Failure Notification
If I'm reading this right, there is an m.delves@ballarat.edu.au subscribed to this list, and that email address no longer exists. James
-----Original Message----- From: Mail Delivery System [mailto:postmaster@ballarat.edu.au] Sent: Sunday, 7 July 2013 12:48 PM To: James Harper Subject: Delivery Failure Notification
With reference to your message addressed to: m.delves@ballarat.edu.au
One or more addresses in your message have failed with the following responses from the mail transport system:
User <m.delves@ballarat.edu.au> is not known at this site
Should you need assistance, please mail postmaster@ballarat.edu.au
------------------- Returned header follows ----------------------
Received: from antispam2.ballarat.edu.au ([141.132.64.22]) by gretel.ballarat.edu.au (1.05.63) with SMTP id 500166000; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 12:46:50 +1000 Received: from tainted.luv.asn.au ([202.158.218.239]) by antispam2.ballarat.edu.au with ESMTP; 07 Jul 2013 12:46:36 +1000 Received: from tainted (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tainted.luv.asn.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33E02510F; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 12:46:35 +1000 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at lists2.luv.asn.au Received: from tainted.luv.asn.au ([127.0.0.1]) by tainted (lists.luv.asn.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ei3oIcWQMJF8; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 12:46:33 +1000 (EST) Received: from tainted.luv.asn.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tainted.luv.asn.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFCD25137; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 12:46:21 +1000 (EST) X-Original-To: luv-main@luv.asn.au Delivered-To: luv-main@luv.asn.au Received: from tainted (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tainted.luv.asn.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA9225109 for <luv-main@luv.asn.au>; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 12:46:17 +1000 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at lists2.luv.asn.au Received: from tainted.luv.asn.au ([127.0.0.1]) by tainted (lists.luv.asn.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d-yS3ugRlF4l for <luv-main@luv.asn.au>; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 12:46:11 +1000 (EST) Received: from smtp2.bendigoit.com.au (mail.bendigoit.com.au [203.16.207.99]) by tainted.luv.asn.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4046A25106 for <luv-main@luv.asn.au>; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 12:46:11 +1000 (EST)
James Harper wrote:
If I'm reading this right, there is an m.delves@ballarat.edu.au subscribed to this list, and that email address no longer exists. Just to be clear; your email was to "m.delves@ballarat.edu.au " indirectly via :" luv-main@luv.asn.au <luv-main@luv.asn.au>" or explicitly ? ie "m.delves@ballarat.edu.au " appears in some "To" field at the top of your email ?
regards Rohan McLeod
Rohan McLeod <rhn@jeack.com.au> wrote:
James Harper wrote:
If I'm reading this right, there is an m.delves@ballarat.edu.au subscribed to this list, and that email address no longer exists. Just to be clear; your email was to "m.delves@ballarat.edu.au " indirectly via :" luv-main@luv.asn.au <luv-main@luv.asn.au>" or explicitly ?
I also received bounces from the same address as a result of mail sent to Luv lists, i.e., indirectly via the list to that address.
Jason White wrote:
Rohan McLeod <rhn@jeack.com.au> wrote:
James Harper wrote:
If I'm reading this right, there is an m.delves@ballarat.edu.au subscribed to this list, and that email address no longer exists. Just to be clear; your email was to "m.delves@ballarat.edu.au " indirectly via :" luv-main@luv.asn.au <luv-main@luv.asn.au>" or explicitly ? I also received bounces from the same address as a result of mail sent to Luv lists, i.e., indirectly via the list to that address.
Well now that I am clear what the symptoms are , I will listen with interest to possible explanations, from those knowledgeable in such matters. ...my expectation would have been that the notification would have gone to luv-main, rather than particular people on that list ! regards Rohan McLeod
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Rohan McLeod <rhn@jeack.com.au> wrote:
Well now that I am clear what the symptoms are , I will listen with interest to possible explanations, from those knowledgeable in such matters. ...my expectation would have been that the notification would have gone to luv-main, rather than particular people on that list !
The ballarat.edu.au mail server is broken. The sysadmins have been informed but don't appear to care. /^From: .*@ballarat.edu.au/ REJECT If you are using postfix then you can put a line like the above in /etc/postfix/reject and the following in /etc/postfix/main.cf and then you won't be bothered by their broken mail server again. header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/reject -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/
Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> writes:
The ballarat.edu.au mail server is broken. The sysadmins have been informed but don't appear to care.
FWIW, I don't see the bounces on gmane.org.user-groups.linux.luv.general (which is odd; I didn't think lars did any fancy filtering).
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, "Trent W. Buck" <trentbuck@gmail.com> wrote:
Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> writes:
The ballarat.edu.au mail server is broken. The sysadmins have been informed but don't appear to care.
FWIW, I don't see the bounces on gmane.org.user-groups.linux.luv.general (which is odd; I didn't think lars did any fancy filtering).
Before I blacklisted the domain in question messages were sent to me personally in response to list postings. So naturally gmane will never archive such messages because gmane never posts to the list. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/
participants (5)
-
James Harper -
Jason White -
Rohan McLeod -
Russell Coker -
trentbuck＠gmail.com