
http://etbe.coker.com.au/2012/08/08/hard-drives-backup/ I've just written the above blog post about my future backup plans. This includes a server that has about 400G of data in the US that I have been backing up via rsync. If I transition that to ZFS then is there any way of starting a send/receive backup process that doesn't involve initially transferring 400G of data? My ADSL plan only allows 150G per month and I can't have a 3 month period of no good backups... -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/

http://etbe.coker.com.au/2012/08/08/hard-drives-backup/
I've just written the above blog post about my future backup plans. This includes a server that has about 400G of data in the US that I have been backing up via rsync. If I transition that to ZFS then is there any way of starting a send/receive backup process that doesn't involve initially transferring 400G of data? My ADSL plan only allows 150G per month and I can't have a 3 month period of no good backups...
I don't understand the problem. You already have a backup of the data, right? Are you asking about the conversion to ZFS and having to restore all the data back onto the new filesystem (which you'd solve by buying an additional 400GB of storage for the month), or are you concerned that rsync will think all the data has changed necessitating a full rsync copy? James

My bad. I didn't know what zfs 'send/receive' was. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. James
-----Original Message----- From: luv-main-bounces@luv.asn.au [mailto:luv-main-bounces@luv.asn.au] On Behalf Of James Harper Sent: Wednesday, 8 August 2012 8:11 PM To: russell@coker.com.au; luv-main@luv.asn.au Subject: RE: ZFS send/receive
http://etbe.coker.com.au/2012/08/08/hard-drives-backup/
I've just written the above blog post about my future backup plans. This includes a server that has about 400G of data in the US that I have been backing up via rsync. If I transition that to ZFS then is there any way of starting a send/receive backup process that doesn't involve initially transferring 400G of data? My ADSL plan only allows 150G per month and I can't have a 3 month period of no good backups...
I don't understand the problem. You already have a backup of the data, right? Are you asking about the conversion to ZFS and having to restore all the data back onto the new filesystem (which you'd solve by buying an additional 400GB of storage for the month), or are you concerned that rsync will think all the data has changed necessitating a full rsync copy?
James
_______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list luv-main@luv.asn.au http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main

On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Russell Coker wrote:
http://etbe.coker.com.au/2012/08/08/hard-drives-backup/
I've just written the above blog post about my future backup plans. This includes a server that has about 400G of data in the US that I have been backing up via rsync. If I transition that to ZFS then is there any way of starting a send/receive backup process that doesn't involve initially transferring 400G of data? My ADSL plan only allows 150G per month and I can't have a 3 month period of no good backups...
I don't know anything that could make a ZFS file system equivalent to the source one (so that snapshots work afterwards) if you rsync. There are of course the "obvious" candidates as compression. I don't know how much it helps. You could divide the original ZFS in various ones by balancing data and manipulating mountpoints. Then you could send them "piece by piece" over a few months while the rsync is still running. Afterwards you can run recursive snapshots from the root of it. Maybe you consider a "zfs send" to a local external disk and then a physical "send by mail". You can encrypt it on the local disk. I am afraid there isn't a good solution out there yet. Regards Peter
participants (3)
-
James Harper
-
Peter Ross
-
Russell Coker