BTW: I found out why Turnbull does not need much bandwidth. Try to contact him: http://www.malcolmturnbull.com.au/contact The contact form is restricted to 200 characters. Regards Peter
On 09/10/2013 04:19 PM, Petros wrote:
BTW: I found out why Turnbull does not need much bandwidth.
Try to contact him: http://www.malcolmturnbull.com.au/contact
The contact form is restricted to 200 characters.
Regards Peter
_______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list luv-main@luv.asn.au http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
He will "tell" what you want and need, he's the expert with a 41% mandate.
Guys, it was mentioned and ignored before, so can I please say for the second time... This kind of political debate belongs on luv-talk. Please, unless you're mentioning Linux, keep it off here. thanks, / Brett On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Roger <arelem@bigpond.com> wrote:
On 09/10/2013 04:19 PM, Petros wrote:
BTW: I found out why Turnbull does not need much bandwidth.
Try to contact him: http://www.malcolmturnbull.com.au/contact
The contact form is restricted to 200 characters.
Regards Peter
_______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list luv-main@luv.asn.au http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
He will "tell" what you want and need, he's the expert with a 41% mandate. _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list luv-main@luv.asn.au http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
EVERYONE! On Tue, September 10, 2013 6:15 pm, Brett Pemberton wrote:
Guys, it was mentioned and ignored before, so can I please say for the second time...
This kind of political debate belongs on luv-talk. Please, unless you're mentioning Linux, keep it off here.
Brett was - and is - right. This email list, luv-main, is meant for Linux-related discussions. https://luv.asn.au/mailinglists.html "The main luv mailing list, for LUV- and Linux-related discussions and questions." Please take the political side of the debate to luv-talk. Please take the non-Linux side of the debate to luv-tech (or luv-talk if it includes some of the politics). Please do not discuss this matter any further here unless you can show it has a direct relationship to Linux. Thank you for keeping our mailing lists a friendly and on-topic environment. -- Lev Lafayette, BA (Hons), GCertPM, MBA mobile: 0432 255 208 RFC 1855 Netiquette Guidelines http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:19:27PM +1000, Petros wrote:
BTW: I found out why Turnbull does not need much bandwidth.
Try to contact him: http://www.malcolmturnbull.com.au/contact
The contact form is restricted to 200 characters.
given that there's maxlength=200 attribute on that field, you could probably just open up the element inspector, delete that attribute, and post as long a message as you liked, plus a 500-word mini-rant on why artifical limits like 200 chars are annoying. chromium, firefox, and even the pretentiously named "Web" by the even more pretentiously named "The Web Developers" (gnome's browser, used to be called epiphany) have an element inspector built in. probably others do too. btw, speaking "Web" and gnome apps - even the few gnome apps i use with xfce (evince regularly, web occasionally) are becoming unusable - it's almost as if they're deliberately making them incompatible with anything not-gnome. i first noticed it about a week ago, evince no longer has text menus and button labels, it now has inscrutable icons[1] which are, for some bizarre reason, now on the *right* hand side of the menu bar instead of on the left where they've been forever and where they are in every other GUI app. [1] IMO, hieroglyphics are for ancient egyptians and modern illiterates. they certainly make no sense at all to me. craig -- craig sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
participants (5)
-
Brett Pemberton -
Craig Sanders -
Lev Lafayette -
Petros -
Roger