On 14/01/2015 2:02 PM, Toby Corkindale wrote:
On 14 January 2015 at 11:01, Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> wrote:
On 13/01/2015 3:12 AM, Robin Humble wrote:
(TL;DR - put your email on a SSD)
Not with TB on a client machine.... file fragmentation doesn't last with TB files; it's next to useless trying to do that. What that means in a nutshell is that far too many files get re-written over and over again and that /could/ be too much for SSD, although SSD is far more durable these days -- subjecting it to TB though is probably asking for trouble.
Oh come on, that's FUD. SSDs are way more durable than that!
It's not FUD.
http://techreport.com/review/24841/introducing-the-ssd-endurance-experiment http://techreport.com/review/27436/the-ssd-endurance-experiment-two-freaking...
Not news to me. Not much doubt about the benefits of SSD, that's why I italicized the /could/ word..... In any case, I have seen TB be absolutely awful with files on at least NTFS .... but I still use it, I won't use it with an SSD though at this stage, but I might one day. What I really want is for TB to store mail in Maildir folders, no matter what the client is -- I am positive that would be perfect no matter what the medium. There has been talk about TB having a Maildir storage option, but last I checked it wasn't progressing. Cheers A.