On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Toby Corkindale <toby.corkindale@strategicdata.com.au> wrote:
Would you still take issue with that approach? I don't want to cause grief with the committee, but since there's a slight demand for the list and the committee has already refused their option to create it, I figure it can't hurt to run an independent one.
Google Groups tends to force Gmail accounts on users which is a good incentive to not use any lists based on that service. That combined with the small demand makes it likely that you won't get a critical mass of subscribers unles something goes wrong with the main LUV lists. It seems that a better option would be to get luv-talk adjusted to better suit your desires. But given that we expelled one member due to racism on luv- talk, a religious extremist went quiet, and one guy who had been anti-social started doing so on luv-main instead it doesn't seem like you will get much unwanted discussion on luv-talk that doesn't happen on luv-main. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/