On 28.10.11 21:13, Russell Coker wrote:
Also if you reply to mail after munging the headers in that manner then the LUV server will munge them again which means that if your MTA uses DKIM then the signature will be broken.
Yes, DKIM is broken by the list server inserting the luv-* guff. (It does that if a thread's OP is not pre-munged by the sender, AIUI?) And the corresponding header unmunging would cause DKIM to barf on the messages on which the list server didn't cause trouble. (If DKIM is used by the recipient.) If the list server were to cease munging subject lines, then there would no longer be any reason for unmunging them on receipt, and there would be no impediment to DKIM working again, I expect. Yes, any recipient who is using DKIM would probably find the header clean-up unattractive, since it would cause DKIM to barf on any signed messages on which the list server didn't cause trouble. Erik -- I have yet to see any problem, however complicated, which, when you looked at it in the right way, did not become still more complicated. - Poul Anderson