On 09/11/2013 09:24 AM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
What planet are you living on?
I look after a bunch of ADSL/SHDSL connections at different premises/exchanges - when they fail they fail (90%) on the LAST 300m - which is what the FTTN will use. **WE** will pay for the FTTN, it is shortsided.
Jobst
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 08:52:16PM +1000, Pidgorny, Slav (GEUS) (slav.pidgorny@anz.com) wrote:
G'day -
-----Original Message----- From: luv-main-bounces@luv.asn.au [mailto:luv-main-bounces@luv.asn.au] On Behalf Of Andrew McGlashan
*FTTP* is the only economic solution, even if it did cost triple what it was projected Why? FTTN is thought to be cheaper. You have to bend definitions quite a bit to end up with a system where price is not a part of economics. Personal note: I'm okay with copper gigabit to endpoint at work, same at home.
Regards
Slav FTTN is nothing but personal opinion held only by Turnbull and a few politicians who truly have not got a clue, but touted it as an election issue. There are 100,000 signatures on the petition according to ABC Radio National this morning. This discussion between like minds on a small list like this is good but let's take it to millions of signatures. Roger