On 07.05.14 00:34, Andrew McGlashan wrote:Is there any evidence for any of those assertions?
> Apparently the Commonwealth Bank was effected, but they claim that
> only the main website was vulnerable, not Netbank -- can you trust
> them? I think NOT! Banks do NOT care about security as much as they
> need to; why do you think tap-and-pay systems are so good for them ...
> it's because the RETAILER takes ALL the risk whilst the bank takes NO
> RISK at all.
That bank cared enough about security to _insist_ on sending a security
dongle when a substantial netbank account was opened - they did not
wish to accept liability for loss of that amount of funds without the
extra security provision.