13 Dec
2012
13 Dec
'12
11:22 p.m.
Quoting Chris Samuel (chris@csamuel.org):
On 14/12/12 07:36, Rick Moen wrote:
I'm not sure that changes anything;
It changes any perception of validity to the recent assertion, in this space, that Microsoft Corporation won't have anything to do with GPL-licensed software -- given that they've been a major developer and distributor of same for 13 years. (Porting and maintenance of, e.g., GNU userspace utilities, Trolltech's Qt libs, Evans and Sutherland's FVWM window manager, Tridge's rsync, etc. _is_ development.) Maintained source code under a variety of open source licences including copyleft ones, here: ftp://ftp.interopsystems.com/src/ Simple point, now made twice. (I'm done.)