On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 07:46:36PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> ISTM that if neither upstart nor systemd deliver the goods once
> finished, then a third new offering will arise. Parallel starting of
> services, and effective handling of events will be provided, one way or
> another, I expect.
that's the problem with systemd - once it takes over, this "third new
offering" will never happen because in order to have even a chance of
success it will not only have to do init's job, it will have to do
dozens of other unrelated tasks. and it will have to do them *ALL* from
the very first version.