Tim Connors via luv-main <luv-main@luv.asn.au> writes:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016, Trent W. Buck wrote:
Andrew McGlashan via luv-main <luv-main@luv.asn.au> writes:
On 7/04/2016 2:22 AM, Russell Coker via luv-main wrote:
So my plan now is to use something simple for sending GPG encrypted mail (which is a small portion of my email) and use Kmail for the majority of mail for which it works quite well.
Simple? Is this simple enough?
$ gpg -e -s -a --default-key B7EFE2FB \ -r andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au| \ mailx -s 'test gpg cli' fred@example.net \ -b fred@example.com
Why does everyone *still* use gnupg 1.x ?
'cause that's what's in Debian?
Both are, since forever. bash4$ rmadison -aamd64 gnupg gnupg2 debian: gnupg | 1.4.10-4+squeeze4 | squeeze-security | amd64 gnupg | 1.4.10-4+squeeze4 | squeeze | amd64 gnupg | 1.4.12-7+deb7u7 | wheezy-security | amd64 gnupg | 1.4.12-7+deb7u7 | wheezy | amd64 gnupg | 1.4.18-7+deb8u1 | jessie | amd64 gnupg | 1.4.20-5 | stretch | amd64 gnupg | 1.4.20-5 | sid | amd64 gnupg2 | 2.0.14-2+squeeze2 | squeeze-security | amd64 gnupg2 | 2.0.14-2+squeeze2 | squeeze | amd64 gnupg2 | 2.0.19-2+deb7u2 | wheezy-security | amd64 gnupg2 | 2.0.19-2+deb7u2 | wheezy | amd64 gnupg2 | 2.0.25-1~bpo70+1 | wheezy-backports | amd64 gnupg2 | 2.0.26-6 | jessie | amd64 gnupg2 | 2.1.11-6 | stretch | amd64 gnupg2 | 2.1.11-6 | sid | amd64