
4 Sep
2013
4 Sep
'13
1:25 p.m.
On Wed, 4 Sep 2013 05:34:22 PM Andrew McGlashan wrote:
Sounds to me that the committee is pissed that this didn't get up.
Four people spoke on the motion, two for and two against. All were committee members (IIRC). I would suggest that we all leave this issue alone now and instead help to make LUV compliant with the current and new rules. All the best, Chris -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic. For more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP