14 Jan
2013
14 Jan
'13
3:27 a.m.
On 08/01/13 16:23, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
On 8/01/2013 11:12 AM, Chris Samuel wrote:
As a counterpoint, here are Marc Merlins experiences with poor ramdom I/O performance with a Samsung SSD (and its replacement), early death of Crucial SSDs and good experience s with OCZ Vertex 4.
http://marc.merlins.org/perso/linux/post_2012-08-15_The-tale-of-SSDs_-Crucia...
That sure goes against the flow....
I would have rated like this:
1. IBM
2. Samsung (probably 1 & 2 interchangeable)
3. Crucial -- only because they don't have an AU local presence that I know about.
I've heard the Intel drives are pretty good; surprised you're not mentioning them at all. I've never heard of the IBM ones!