On 13/10/2014 9:53 PM, Chris Samuel wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 08:05:22 PM Andrew McGlashan wrote:
Well, that was an /old/ report
Where old = 17 days ago, and is the most recent report from the release team.
Okay, so not so old, but it is dated already as I understand -- some news is good for a minute, other news for a year and other news anywhere in between or far beyond -- some news is even old news by the time it is presented (that happens regularly).
So I'd say it's in trouble unless they've managed to get more people involved rapidly..
Well, i17 day old news item was jumped on too quickly and the responses since that news item show that there is not likely going to be a problem for the port with much progress being made; maybe they still need more people to get involved, but that is very likely to happen as a consequence of systemd alone. If you consider kFreeBSD as being Debian userland without the possibility of systemd inclusion ... there is now potential for a much greater army to help [in all sorts of ways]. And to make a move to kFreeBSD even better, we'll get native ZFS too. A.