On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 08:34:35PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:09:29 PM Joel W. Shea via luv-main wrote:
There may (or may not) have been discussion amongst the committee [...]
There wasn't a discussion because no-one on the committee felt the need for a discussion. I suggested that we have one but it seems that no-one had any problems with it. I enabled it on the committee list before luv-talk and everyone there seemed happy.
I guess that works in-lieu of a discussion. Thanks for the explaination, I appreciate that.
For comparison the committee discussion about moving the LUV server (probably the most important issue the committee has discussed in the past year or so) was held on Google Hangouts and we only got 5/9 in attendance.
Are there any minutes taken/published for committee meetings? Are they even necessary? Other committee members feel free to chime in here.
The history of LUV shows that asking for commentary from members before making a change is something you only do if you don't want to make a change.
Ha ha, fair enough, I can sympathise with that :-)
It took us years to get public archives for the LUV lists with many discussions like this along the way.
Your memory on that issue is obviously much better than mine, thanks for the context.