3 Nov
2011
3 Nov
'11
11:34 a.m.
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Jeremy Visser <jeremy@visser.name> wrote:
On 03/11/2011, at 18:30, Jason White wrote:
msg_footer = ''
Omitting that may have legal requirements, may it not?
No it may not. Legalistic sigs are meaningless. The LUV sig is not legalistic, it's merely informative. It's not necessary to turn off the sig when the DKIM signature has the l= flag, but as gmail (the main source of DKIM signed messages) doesn't appear to use l= it's probably best to turn it off. Finally the list server needs to not delete the DKIM header from the mail as it goes through. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/