18 Apr
2012
18 Apr
'12
4:10 a.m.
On 18/04/12 14:06, Russell Coker wrote:
As an aside, I'm trying to avoid upgrading some of my servers until I feel that BTRFS is ready to use on them.
Current state of play is that 3.2.x seems like both the earliest and latest stable version of btrfs - there are regressions in 3.3.x which are not fixed yet (early ENOSPC issues). Certainly don't run anything earlier than 3.2 with btrfs as that can corrupt filesystems on power loss. -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC