
3 Sep
2013
3 Sep
'13
11:30 p.m.
Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au> wrote:
If this issue comes up again next year, I think we really need to have a carefully researched document (e.g. a FAQ), which is checked by Linux Australia for correctness, and updated based on mailing list feedback. This needs to be produced sometime before the meeting, so we can be sure people are making decisions based on the correct information.
I hope the underlying concerns can be addressed well before next year's meeting. The failure of the motion yesterday gives Luv time for a proper review of the issues.