4 Sep
2013
4 Sep
'13
3:02 a.m.
On Wed, 4 Sep 2013, George Georgakis <luv-sub@tripleg.net.au> wrote:
Personally, I'm glad LUV deferred the decision. Throwing in such a controversial (and effectively irreversible) issue to the vote, so close to the AGM, was always going to be a bad idea.
The issue was discussed in committee meetings months before it happened. Daniel didn't indicate such a great opposition to the idea in committee and didn't give much in the way of reasons for not doing it. We could have had a discussion about this months earlier, Daniel could have started such a discussion if he wanted to. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/